Macbook pro geekbench 2017 score12/7/2023 ![]() The Note 8, meanwhile, has a Snapdragon 835 that will get you 20 in the same tests. That A10 Fusion is slower than the A10X and the A11 Bionic. The brand new Galaxy Note 8 can’t touch last year’s iPhone 7 Plus which sports an A10 Fusion chip that only hits 33 in Geekbench tests. And that usually means inflicting pain on any competing Android device. Now, even if we’re looking at raw tests here, we have to point out that high iPhone benchmark scores always translate into great real-life performance. The iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus are also powered by the same A11 Bionic chipset. When has a mobile chip been able to match a desktop processor in raw benchmarks? What other smartphones can offer similar performance? Even with cheating enabled, no Android device can really touch these numbers, and it’ll be interesting to see whether Qualcomm’s next processor can get anywhere close to that. But, think about the numbers for a second. Sure, that doesn’t mean the A11 Bionic can do all the things a desktop CPU does. ![]() That means the iPhone X is slower in single-core tasks but speedier in multi-core tasks. ![]() The highest-end dual-core 13-inch MacBook Pro scores 45 in Geekbench 4 tests. Single-Core Score 1065 File Compression 888 127.5 MB/sec Navigation 1077 6. Geekbench 6.1.0 for macOS AVX2 Result Information. That’s much better than the 10.5-inch iPad Pro (38 average scores), which isn’t surprising, considering that the 2017 iPads have A10X chips inside. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2017) with an Intel Core i5-7360U processor. ![]() But they can go up to 428, as found by MacRumors. Geekbench 4 single-core tests average around 4169, while multi-core have a 9836 average. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |